MyHHR News Locations
EN | FR
Practices
People
Careers
Associate Recruiting Working At HHR Available Positions
Culture
About Us Diversity Pro Bono
Practices
People
Careers
Associate Recruiting Working At HHR Available Positions
Culture
About Us Diversity Pro Bono
MyHHR News Locations
EN | FR
Practices
People
News
View All Results >

Rita M. Haeusler

Partner

Los Angeles

+1 (213) 613-2896

rita.haeusler@hugheshubbard.com
LinkedIn
Download V Card
 
Saved To MyHHR

“Rita M. Haeusler”

General Folder

View MyHHR
Share/Print
Email Print
   
Biography
Selected Matters
Client Advisories
News

Rita M. Haeusler is a partner in Hughes Hubbard & Reed's Litigation practice, chair of the firm’s Class Action practice group, and head of the firm’s Los Angeles office. She has more than 30 years' experience litigating in a variety of state and federal courts throughout California, Nevada, Arizona, the Pacific Northwest, Tennessee, New Jersey and New York, and before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Her practice focuses primarily on complex litigation in the areas of intellectual property, entertainment, antitrust, class actions, e-commerce, privacy and employment law. She has worked on a number of cases involving drug companies, including the defense of the Cartwright Act and California Business & Professions Code Section 17200 claims brought by independent pharmacies alleging price-fixing and unfair competition with respect to prescription pharmaceuticals.

Among her professional activities, she is a member of Union Internationale des Avocats, a recent past chair and current member of the board of directors of the 9th Judicial Circuit Historical Society, and a member of the International bar Association.

She received both her B.A. cum laude and her J.D. from the University of California, Los Angeles.

Recognitions

  • Recommended in The Legal 500 United States for Product Liability, Mass Tort and Class Action Defense: Consumer Products (including Tobacco) (2022)  

Professional Activities

  • Member, advisory board, USC Gould School of Law, Institute for Corporate Counsel (2009 – 2011)
  • Member, Union Internationale des Avocats, International Bar Association
  • Recent past chair and current member, board of directors, 9th Judicial Circuit Historical Society

Court Admissions

  • U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
  • U.S. District Court of Arizona
  • U.S. District Court of Nevada
  • U.S. District Court of New Jersey
  • U.S. District Court of Oregon
  • U.S. District Court of Tennessee
  • Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Class Action Litigation Matters

  • Mansour v. One of the World's Most Popular Dating Apps:  Represent one of the world's most popular dating apps in defense of putative class action brought by male users of the dating app interested in women who claim that the dating app's “women message first” feature discriminates against men on the basis of sexual orientation and gender, and related California Bus. & Prof. Code Section 17200 unfair competition claim. In addition, the Mansour case involves the apps user data privacy rights and cross-border transfer of such data in the sensitive areas of dating and personal relationships
  • Lingasin v. One of the World's Most Popular Dating Apps and its founder:  Represent one of the world's most popular dating apps, and its founder, in defense of putative class action brought by men interested in women who visited the dating app in the Apple and Google stores and who claim to have been deterred from signing up for the dating app due to its allegedly discriminatory “women message first” feature, and related California Bus. & Prof. Code Section 17200 unfair competition and negligence claims
  • Thompson v. Vitamin Shoppe: Represented Vitamin Shoppe in defense of wage-and-hour class-action and representative Personal Attorney General Act (PAGA) claims alleging unfair employment practices
  • DeLeon v. Campaigners Inc. et al.: Represented Campaigners Inc. in defense of a wage-and-hour class action alleging unfair employment practices
  • O'Hara v. Factory 2-U Stores Inc.: Represented Factory 2-U in defense of a wage-and-hour class action alleging unfair employment practices. Achieved lowest settlement number by several million dollars of any similar action
  • DiSimone v. DS Waters of America Inc.: Represent DS Waters in defense of a consumer fraud class action alleging deceptive advertising practices
  • Frausto v. Sparkletts Waters of North American LP et al.: Represent DS Waters in defense of a consumer class action alleging claims of unfair competition and false advertising and violations of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act
  • Malone v. Danone Waters of North America Inc., etc. et al.: Represented DS Waters in defense of a consumer class action alleging false advertising and warranty claims based on offers for free Sparkletts products. Achieved de minimis settlement after defeating the plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief
  • Reff v. Danone Waters of North America Inc., etc. et al.: Represented DS Waters in defense of a consumer class action alleging unfair late charges. Achieved dismissal with no payment by defendants
  • Feld v. Circus Circus Hotel & Casino: Represented Circus Circus Hotel & Casino and Mandalay Bay Resorts in defense of a putative class action alleging false advertising of room rates. Achieved de minimis $1 per claimant coupon settlement
  • DePirro v. Advanced Marketing Services: Represented Advanced Marketing Services in defense of a consumer class action under Proposition 65 alleging tainted products, and under California Business & Professions Code Section 17200 alleging false advertising. Achieved dismissal following de minimis settlement
  • DePirro v. Shuyemora Cosmetics Inc. and Sephora: Represented Shuyemora Cosmetics and Sephora in defense of a class action under Proposition 65 alleging sale of tainted cosmetics, and under California Business & Professions Code Section 17200 alleging false advertising. Achieved dismissal following de minimis settlement
  • Smith v. VISA Inc., etc. et al.: Represent Innovative Merchant Solutions, a subsidiary of Intuit, in a class action alleging violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §1, the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§15(a) et seq., and the Cartwright Act, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§16270 et seq
  • Soualian v. Barneys Inc.: Represent Barney's in defense of a putative class action alleging violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, 15 U.S.C. §1681c(g) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Defeated class certification
  • Najarian v. Avis Rent A Car Systems LLC: Represent Avis in defense of a putative class action alleging violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, 15 U.S.C. §1681c(g) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Defeated class certification. Case settled for de minimis payment
  • Thibeault v. Avis Rent A Car Systems LLC: Represent Avis in defense of a putative class action alleging violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, 15 U.S.C. §1681c(g) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Case settled for de minimis payment
  • Khorovsky v. Vitamin Shoppe: Represented Vitamin Shoppe in defense of a putative class action alleging violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, 15 U.S.C. §1681c(g) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Case settled for de minimis payment
  • Torossian v. Vitamin Shoppe: Represented Vitamin Shoppe in defense of a putative class action alleging violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, 15 U.S.C. §1681c(g) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Case settled for de minimis payment
  • Sutton v. Expedia: Represented Expedia in defense of a putative class action alleging violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, 15 U.S.C. §1681c(g) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act
  • Virag v. Allergan, etc. et al.: Represented Merck & Co. Inc. in defense of a consumer class action alleging unfair competition in the average wholesale pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals. Achieved dismissal with no payment by defendants
  • California Congress of Seniors v. Allergan, etc. et al.: Represent Merck & Co. Inc. in defense of a representative consumer action alleging unfair competition in the average wholesale pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals. Achieved dismissal with no payment by defendants
  • Clayworth v. Merck: Represented Merck & Co. Inc. in defense of Cartwright Act and California Business & Professions Code Section 17200 claims brought by independent pharmacies alleging price-fixing and unfair competition with respect to prescription pharmaceuticals. Case disposed of on summary judgment in favor of Merck; affirmed on appeal; currently pending before the California Supreme Court
  • In re Wireless Telephone 911 Calls Litigation: Represent LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics Mobilecomm USA Inc. in connection with the defense of ten putative class actions coordinated before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging that the products of various cellular telephone manufacturers and service providers do not process emergency calls in the manner required by the Federal Communications Commission; actions voluntarily dismissed with prejudice with defendants’ summary judgments motions pending
  • Hirsch v. Jackoway: Represented the Jackoway Tyerman entertainment law firm in a dispute alleging breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract with respect to employment agreements and percentage fee agreements; settled following a seven-week bench trial

General Litigation Matters

  • Frank v. LG Electronics Mobilecomm USA Inc.: Represent the US cellular phone distribution unit of LG Electronics Inc. (Korea) in defense of a claim alleging fraudulent and deceptive sales practices
  • Massaro v. LG Electronics Mobilecomm USA Inc.:Represent the US cellular phone distribution unit of LG Electronics Inc. (Korea) in defense of a products liability claim alleging injury purportedly caused by a defective cellular phone
  • Tate v. LG Electronics Mobilecomm USA Inc.: Represent the US cellular phone distribution unit of LG Electronics Inc. (Korea) in a defense of a claim alleging hearing loss purportedly caused by a cellular phone
  • Southerland v. LG Electronics Mobilecomm USA Inc.: Represent the US cellular phone distribution unit of LG Electronics Inc. (Korea) in defense of a products liability claim alleging injury purportedly caused by a defective cellular phone
  • Reilly v. Boy Scouts of America: Represent a local Boy Scouts troop in defense of a claim alleging that the troop is subject to—and in violation of—the Americans with Disabilities Act
  • Marciano v. Fahs (Christie's Inc.): Represent a former Christie's Auction House employee in claims brought by former client Georges Marciano (co-founder of "Guess" clothing and apparel company), alleging theft of art and property. Successfully had the case dismissed with prejudice and won monetary sanctions against Marciano
  • Film US (formerly known as Entertainment Industry Development Council (Film US)): Represent Film US, the film permitting agency, in representative actions relating to alleged unfair film permitting practices. Majority of the cases disposed of on summary judgment in favor of Film US with successful Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation claims by Film US

Employment Law Matters

  • Counsel insurance companies, national retail chains, investment firms, trading companies, banks and newspapers regarding employment and independent contractor issues
顔認識技術:民間使用に対する拡大する規制
Client Advisories
View News Article
Facial Recognition Technology: The Expanding Regulation of Private Sector Use
Client Advisories
View News Article
CCPA Litigation
Client Advisories
View News Article
COVID-19: Privacy Law in the Time of Pandemic
Client Advisories
View News Article
California Suspends Penalty Portions of California WARN Act in Response to COVID-19
Client Advisories
View News Article
Five Things to Know About New York State's Paid Family Leave
Client Advisories
View News Article
New NYC Rules For Hiring Domestic Workers And Other Freelancers As Independent Contractors
Client Advisories
View News Article
Defending Class Action Claims of False Cosmetics Labeling
Client Advisories
View News Article
Employers Should Review Their Social Networking Policies
Client Advisories
View News Article
NLRB Issues Complaint Against Employer For Facebook Termination
Client Advisories
View News Article
Not All Zombies Are Created Equal: Owners of Rights to "Dawn of the Dead" Lose Copyright Suit Over Popular Video Game
Client Advisories
Rita M. Haeusler Partner
View News Article
Ninth Circuit to Address Constitutionality of Content-Based Regulation of Video Games
Client Advisories
Rita M. Haeusler Partner
View News Article

News

Firm Guides CI&T’s First U.S. Acquisition
News & Events |
Deals & Matters
View News Article
Litigation Wrap: Third Quarter 2022
News & Events
View News Article
HHR Attorneys Included in Inaugural Lawdragon 500 Leading Litigators in America Guide
News & Events |
Awards
View News Article
Firm Advises Cantor Fitzgerald SPAC in Business Combination with Rumble
News & Events |
Deals & Matters
View News Article
Hughes Hubbard Wins Dismissal of Trademark Suit for Grocery Wholesaler
News & Events
View News Article
HHR Advises Tao Group Hospitality in Combination With Hakkasan Group
News & Events |
Deals & Matters
View News Article
Firm Guides ANI Pharmaceuticals in Deal to Buy Novitium Pharma
News & Events
View News Article
Hughes Hubbard Assists Cantor Fitzgerald SPAC in Proposed Merger With AEye
News & Events |
Deals & Matters
View News Article
Hughes Hubbard Advises JD Sports in Deal to Buy DTLR Villa
News & Events |
Deals & Matters
View News Article
Firm Assists JD Sports in Purchase of Shoe Palace and Nice Kicks
News & Events |
Deals & Matters
View News Article
Firm Advises Platinum Equity in Nesco’s $1.48B Deal
News & Events |
Deals & Matters
View News Article
Firm Assists Infosys in Deal to Buy Blue Acorn iCi
News & Events |
Deals & Matters
View News Article
Hughes Hubbard Reps Global IT Leader Infosys in Acquisition of Kaleidoscope Innovation
News & Events |
Deals & Matters
View News Article
Hughes Hubbard Advises Global IT Leader Infosys in Acquisition of Simplus
News & Events |
Deals & Matters
View News Article
Celebrating International Women's Day
News & Events |
People
View News Article
Firm Reps MSG in Purchase of Majority Stake in Esports Company
News & Events |
Deals & Matters
View News Article
​​​Hughes Hubbard Wins Dismissal of MGA's $429M Fraud Suit
News & Events |
Deals & Matters
View News Article
​​​Firm Helps Soul Train Shake Off Lawsuit
News & Events |
Deals & Matters
View News Article
​Hughes Hubbard's CRG Named Among Law360 Practice Groups of the Year
News & Events |
Awards
View News Article
Education
  • University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) School of Law, J.D., 1983
  • University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), B.A., 1980, cum laude with Departmental Honors
Bar Admissions
  • California, 1983
Areas of Focus
Antitrust & Competition
Arbitration
Class Actions
Corporate Reorganization & Bankruptcy
Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation
Employment & Unfair Competition
Litigation

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

Copyright 2023


Legal Notices & Methodologies Attorney Advertising Sitemap
  • Locations
  • New York City
  • Kansas City
  • Los Angeles
  • Miami
  • Paris
  • Rio de Janeiro*
  • Tokyo
  • Washington, D.C.

*In cooperation with Saud Advogados

Privacy Policies and Notices

Careers
Associate Recruiting Working At HHR Available Positions
Culture
About Us Diversity Pro Bono
Contact