Michael Salzman Discusses AI-Related Risks and Accountability Facing Lawyers
Explores the risks and responsibilities associated with lawyers’ use of AI.
Highlights
Salzman discusses risks associated with AI use by lawyers, including fabricated citations, incorrect legal analysis, false factual claims and privilege concerns around’ general-purpose AI systems.
Salzman explains how differing AI rules and guidance across jurisdictions present manageable challenges for legal practitioners.
Michael Salzman – who is senior counsel at Hughes Hubbard, and previously spent four decades as a litigation partner and the firm’s general counsel – discussed the legal profession’s evolving approach to AI and the risks associated with its use with Newsweek.
The article examines how courts and professional bodies are developing guidance governing AI use as lawyers continue to face accountability for AI use in their work product, including instances where AI-generated materials have resulted in fabricated citations and other errors.
Salzman, who also serves as the chair of the New York City Bar’s Professional Ethics Committee, explained the risks associated with AI use, including fabricated citations, incorrect legal analysis, false factual claims, and potential confidentiality and privilege concerns when lawyers use general-purpose AI systems.
Salzman also discussed how lawyers can navigate differing AI guidance across jurisdictions.
“The differences are not fundamental, and lawyers are used to dealing with differences in the laws and court rules in different places within the U.S.,” Salzman said.
Over the past two years, the New York City Bar’s Professional Ethics Committee has issued several opinions discussing the ethical obligations of lawyers when employing AI.
Featured Lawyers
Stay Up to Date
Sign up to receive practical updates, fresh perspectives and helpful guidance delivered straight to your inbox.
Stay connected for our latest news and insights.